You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 4 Preferences for genetic-based personalized nutrition by psychological characteristics

From: Consumer acceptance of genetic-based personalized nutrition in Hungary

  Total, % Particularly attractive, % Both attractive and not attractive, % Not attractive at all, % χ2 N
Perceived risk
 Agree 46.5 13.8 (− 6.8) 41.4 (-2.3) 44.8 (8.9) 93.018*** 903
 Disagree 53.5 33.3 (6.8) 49.1 (2.3) 17.6 (− 8.9)
Perceived uncertainty
 Agree 78.8 21.4 (− 2.8) 46.2 (0.0) 32.4 (2.5) 10.279** 955
 Disagree 21.2 30.7 (2.8) 46.0 (0.0) 23.3 (-2.5)
Subjective norms
 Agree 45.0 37.3 (8.0) 42.5 (− 0.8) 20.2 (− 6.5) 78.162*** 815
 Disagree 55.0 13.2 (8.0) 45.3 (0.8) 41.5 (6.5)
Perceived costs/benefits
 Agree 55.8 34.9 (7.9) 48.9 (2.8) 16.2 (− 10.5) 127.687*** 905
 Disagree 44.2 12.0 (− 7.9) 39.5 (− 2.8) 48.5 (10.5)
Perceived behavioural control
 Agree 63.4 29.9 (5.2) 44.3 (− 0.2) 25.7 (− 4.6) 35.234*** 907
 Disagree 36.6 14.5 (− 5.2) 45.2 (0.2) 40.4 (4.6)
  1. Source: Authors’ own compilation. Adjusted standardized residuals are in brackets. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
\